Hi Sweety, 1. Audited fields are those fields that when changed trigger an audit operation. They won't be copied to the audit form unless they change. 2. Copied fields are those fields whose values are copied to the audit form when any one of the audited fields are changed. 3. Audited and copied are fields that trigger an audit if they change and are also copied if some other field change triggers an audit.
There are 2 kinds of audit forms. The log version has a delimited string field with the field changes logged within it. The form version uses a complete copy of the form to hold the audit information in matching fields. In both methods there are additional core fields for data such as the login of the user making the change and the date of the change. I find the form based auditing to be a pretty useful and powerful feature. It can be used for creating features such as 1. A detailed audit log with before and after field values, who changed it and when 2. Keeping a version history of items that can be viewed in their original state 3. If you are trying to keep a remedy system in sync with another system the audit form may be a better source than the actual form as changes can be replicated without gaps in order Hope this helps, Rod Harris On 24 June 2014 07:44, Sweety <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Experts, > > Can you please help me to understand the difference between settings of > field level auditing and form level auditing? > > What is the difference between; > 1. Audited > 2. Copied > 3. Audited and Copied > > What is the difference between; > 1. Form Style Auditing > 2. Log Style Auditing > > Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
