I haven't looked too closely at how it does it but if I remember correctly
it perform direct SQL so I think you will be ok.


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Joe D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
> Cool J..
>
>
>
> Hopefully it doesn’t touch the Last Modified By and Last Modified
> information on tickets? If it does it might be a better idea to write a SQL
> job to do the same thing..
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 16, 2014 5:53 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Company Name change in ITSM 7.6.04...
>
>
>
> **
>
> This was delayed in my spam box.  Thanks for confirming it is available in
> 7.6.04.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Ars Lister <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> **
>
> I second on that Joe.  The only way to successfully update Company or Site
> info in ITSM 7.6.04 is with the Data Management tool which has the Data
> Wizard mentioned by Mr. Miller.  It will modify whatever company names you
> want to change in all the ITSM forms and the Atrium CMDB where appropriate
> with one action.  It takes a while, but it gets it done.
>
> Good luck with that!
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 4:07 PM, Jason Miller <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> **
>
> Hey Joe,
>
>
>
> Have you looked at the Data Wizard?
>
>
>
> https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/itsm80/Overview+of+the+data+wizard
>
>
>
> Here are some screenshots I took from our Dev (has an orange skin) that
> shows you can rename a company, the forms it touches and the record counts
> in each form.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fNwkJPuAdzGmUngGk5GNaIS7RuixSNylIUBogaUn65E/pub
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Joe D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> **
>
> Has anyone attempted this successfully? If so do you have a whole list of
> places where this name might be needed to be changed?
>
>
>
> I have noticed that the design of the ITSM application is not very
> consistent about where it uses the Request ID (Entry ID or Field 1) or
> instanceID or some GUID to relate such data and where it uses something
> like Company Name itself to relate data. For e.g. in the SIT:Site Company
> Association table, it looks like the Company Name is used in the
> relationship, while in some other places either the Company Entry ID or the
> instanceId is used.
>
>
>
> This could mean that a name change could possibly break a few data
> relationships, if the name change doesn’t propagate to all the forms that
> use the name in the relationship..
>
>
>
> Does anyone have a complete list of forms where this relationship might be
> broken in the event one needs to change the Company Name? I’m suspecting
> there is no OTB workflow, which would propagate this change to all forms
> that might need to reflect this change.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A simple SQL search show 737 forms that have data fields that Company in
> the field name where the field is a data field.
>
>
>
> SQL> select count(*) from aradmin.arschema where schemaid in (select
> schemaid from aradmin.field where fieldname = 'Company' and fieldtype = 1)
> order by name;
>
>        458
>
>
>
> SQL>
>
> SQL> select count(*) from aradmin.arschema where schemaid in (select
> schemaid from aradmin.field where fieldname like '%Company%' and
> fieldtype = 1) order by name;
>
>        737
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> PS: Does ITSM 8.x handle name change of a company better than 7.6.04??
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>  _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to