Hi,
Me and Magnus will definitely be there.
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se
> So LJ is going… aside from the Unisys folks that we know will be there, who
> else WILL be attending from our string of conversation here??
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 9:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: ENGAGE
>
> **
> Apparently...the process took a bit longer than anticipated....one of my two
> topics got accepted, so it appears I WILL be attending Engage this year :)
>
> It appears that the content of sessions has shifted a bit in the last week. I
> reported 120 at the end of last Monday. As of this exact moment, there are
> only 102 active sessions, 41 are Remedy related, 11 by non BMCers, and 4 are
> technical.
>
> So, the numbers are shifting a bit....but my topic isn't in that list yet, but
> it titled 'Remedy Java API – Basic Components' where I plan on discussing
> how the API is structured, how the objects relate to what you see in Remedy
> Dev Studio as well as Mid-Tier, and how to manipulate your Remedy system
> through the API to get the best out of it. :)...
>
> I'm hopeful at this point that Engage is morphing into something a bit more
> acceptable to the many technical resources we have here on the list.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:27 PM, LJ LongWing
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I guess the best 'rejection letter' you can possibly get is the accepted list
> coming out and not being able to find yourself anywhere on there.
>
> Looking through the sessions, I see there are 120 sessions total. 46 are
> 'Remedy' related, that's ITSM or ROD (38%) in some way or another. Of those
> only 12 are not being done by BMCers (10%). 4 of those are listed as
> 'Technical' (3%). All 4 of them are directly related to ITSM (3 SRM, 1 CMDB).
> Nothing that's directly related to Remedy as a development platform, but as a
> platform to sell their OOTB tools....part of me is disappointed, but not
> surprised.
>
> Both of the topics I submitted were of a technical nature, relating to Remedy,
> not ITSM...so, I guess that's likely why neither topic was selected for
> presentation....
>
> and due due to the fact that I was counting on not paying the admission fees,
> I'm not going to be able to justify the expense to attend this
> year...so...maybe I'll do them anyway, but post them on my site instead so
> everyone can benefit instead of just the ones that attend Engage...who knows.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Jason Miller
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> By doing our own thing we would simply be creating an overlay on ENGAGE. Once
> we create the overlay we can customize and changes by BMC won't have an
> impact. Except if they delete one of us in base, that will have an impact on
> the overlay.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Tauf Chowdhury
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> Not if you do it from a hotel room though? I'll pitch in for a suite. We can
> set up a google hang out and a live tweet session.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:40 PM, laurent matheo
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> Yeah I proposed this... Somekind of "genius bar" or something, maybe panel
> like, or small breakouts or something...
> Could have been setup like a "mini community onsite" using Matt for this...
>
> Maybe we could squat the booth location for this when it's not attended? If
> it's like wwrug, it's just opened for lunch / not a long time, we could use
> the place to do some small groups about a theme or something?
>
> So, a mix between the "bird & the feathers", "genius bar", "community" and
> whatever?
>
> We could even stream it live on the net so the others could see it (that could
> be a problem with BMC rules though).
>
> On 29 Jul, 2014,at 01:36 AM, Tauf Chowdhury
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> I was willing to sponsor a technical/learning lab at the conference. Reached
> out to numerous people. Deaf ears. Oh well... I'm still going. Love networking
> (by networking I mean drinking) with you guys if you decide to go.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Tauf Chowdhury
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> In browsing through the sessions and speakers, the title of unnamed speaker
> pretty much sums up my assessment of the catalog: Lead Technical Marketing
> Consultant
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:31 PM, laurent matheo
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> The evening is still there, Tuesday from 6 to 8 PM:
> http://www.eventmgmt.aimia.com/events/bmc-engage-2014/custom-20-2bc888d975f2496db5d3f819b9735209.aspx
>
> But that's weird... Since breakouts continue from 6 to 9 PM on tuesday... So
> or you go stalk the Engineers (and potentially miss 2 breakouts), or you
> attend the breakouts (and miss the candy)?
>
> On 29 Jul, 2014,at 01:26 AM, Rick Cook
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
>
> And with so many evening sessions, where does the Evening with Engineering or
> the other evening activities go? Will they even have them?
>
> Rick
> On Jul 28, 2014 4:24 PM, "Jason Miller"
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> Not impressed. My first impress is welcome back BMC Marketing World. We
> haven't missed you all these years. Maybe I need to just let it soak in for a
> day or two?.?.?.
>
> Unless I am overlooking something it seems there are very few presentations by
> customers.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Sanford, Claire
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> **
> Just shaking my head…
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of laurent
> matheo
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:32 PM
>
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ENGAGE
>
>
>
> **
> It seems the list is on now:
> http://bmc.g2planet.com/bmcengage2014/event_agenda
>
> On 29 Jul, 2014,at 12:25 AM, "Sanford, Claire"
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> You are certainly trusting Terry!
>
> I’ll wait for the agenda and hope they extend the early bird rate. I can
> see it now…
>
> ME: Hi Mr. Director, please spend thousands of dollars for me to be gone for
> almost a week for a conference where we have no idea what the content is.
> There is an early bird discount!!!
>
> DIR: Come back when you have an agenda and a firm grasp on what you sessions
> are going to attend AND how much you are going to spend.
>
> ME: Big Sigh…
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tauf Chowdhury
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 4:52 PM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ENGAGE
>
> **
> Is that like the "good faith" deposit at a car dealer? Say goodbye to that
> $75! Hehe
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 5:49 PM, Terry Bootsma
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> **
> I believe early bird pricing expires July 31st. So, if the agenda is out
> today or tomorrow, that is just "under the wire".
>
> However, I had to make a call last week, so I registered and paid for the
> conference with the understanding that I could de-register up to a certain
> date with a $75.00 "admin" fee. Well, we'll see about that. :-)
>
> Terry
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lynn Larsen
> Sent: July-28-14 5:03 PM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ENGAGE
> **
> I’m glad I’m not alone in the trying to get approval for a conference that
> we have no idea what the content is… There should not be “early bird”
> pricing that expires before the detailed agenda is even published, in my
> opinion.
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sanford, Claire
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 3:55 PM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ENGAGE
>
> **
> They missed one mark… in order to get a room you have to go through their
> conference desk. We are adults. We should be able to make our own
> reservations.
>
> If the conference is more “sales” than technical, there is no way I can
> get approval. I’ll be disappointed if they go back to the way it was before
> it became WWRUG!
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 3:51 PM
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ENGAGE
>
> **
> I agree that our WWRUG friends are much better at communicating and giving
> people the information they need to decide, get approvals and make travel
> arrangements than BMC. Let's just hope they don't completely miss the mark on
> this conference.
>
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:47 AM, David Boylan
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I still haven't seen much of what is being presented other that lots of
> marketing.
>
> Is this even worth going to?
>
>
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
> www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> ________________________________
>
> Note: This e-mail and any attachments may be privileged and confidential and
> protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or use of this e-mail and any attachments is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by
> returning it to the sender and deleting it from your computer system. Thank
> you for your cooperation.
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: "Where
> the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
> --
> Tauf Chowdhury
>
>
> --
> Tauf Chowdhury
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> --
> Tauf Chowdhury
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
