Hi,

These fields are probably always there regardless of wether you have
explicitly added them to your form.

DevStudio will not show fields that are NOT added, for example in a Set-Fields
situation.

But when you use a Run Process Table Refresh, you just type in the field id,
and it will work fine.

        Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)

Ask the Remedy Licensing Experts (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12/13):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

> I remember doing things like this years back, but with different "hidden"
> fields - many thanks, will pass on the suggestion.
>
> Regards
>
> Dave
>
> On 23 February 2015 at 18:11, Joe D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> Yes I believe it works that way too now. I did have that experience of
>> needing to create a place holder hidden field for fields that have implicit
>> field ID values way back in the past. That was mostly because the AR Admin
>> Tool was not as smart as the Dev Studio is these days. I just threw that in
>> just in case the dev studio complained like the Admin tool used to a few
>> versions ago. I think it was during the version 4 days I had to do that for
>> showing or hiding the advanced qualification bar on the web tier.
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *LJ LongWing
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 1:07 PM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: F5 equivalent via workflow
>>
>>
>>
>> **
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>> My personal experience is that you can utilize the field in the
>> run-process, without the field existing on the form because it's implicitly
>> already there, on a regular form at least....try it on a display only form,
>> or something similar, you are likely to have a problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Joe D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> **
>>
>> In the past (way back a few versions during the AR Admin Tool days) in
>> order to use that run process in conjunction with the results list field
>> (or any other AR workflow action for that matter) you had to create a
>> hidden table field with a 1020 ID to allow you to associate workflow to
>> that ID. It was like a place holder field for 1020 to use it in workflow.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m not sure if they have changed that now and allow you to do so without
>> the developer studio complaining that the field does not exist.
>>
>>
>>
>> Just thought I would throw that out in case you get a similar error with
>> the Dev Studio with the recent versions too.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *LJ LongWing
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 10:58 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: F5 equivalent via workflow
>>
>>
>>
>> **
>>
>> Dave, do a PERFORM-ACTION-TABLE-REFRESH (or equivalent actual run-process
>> name) on field 1020, which is the field for 'Result List', this effectively
>> performs an 'F5' action.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Dave Barber <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> **
>>
>> This was a query sent over to me from a colleague.  Personally not sure
>> how to handle it (I gave up when I saw macro - we're moving to 8.1 at some
>> point, ain't no client side macros no more).
>>
>> ======================================================
>>
>> User Tool Version: 7.6.04 SP4
>>
>> Server Version: 7.6.04 SP4
>>
>>
>>
>> Bespoke Incident Application.
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to be able to refresh an incident from the Incident form itself,
>> using workflow, in the same way that hitting F5 refreshes the incident.
>>
>>
>>
>> The form is in *Modify* mode.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Commit Changes* is not suitable since it does not appear to have the
>> same effect as simply clicking F5.
>>
>>
>>
>> Opening a new window for the same entryID and closing the old one is not
>> suitable due to problematic interaction with a macro query and rsults list
>> handling.
>>
>>
>>
>> From an *Active Link* attached to a button, I have tried using *Run
>> Process* with PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY (Record ID is the entryID, field
>> ID 1). PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY returns no value and merely returns an
>> anonymous failure if used it with Set Fields and $PROCESS$. It is also only
>> run on an AL in the client, so requires no “@@:” token. I have tried
>> these
>> variants :
>>
>>
>>
>> PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY “$Record ID$”
>>
>> PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY $Record ID$
>>
>> PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY <hard coded entry ID>
>>
>> PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY “<hard coded entry ID>”
>>
>>
>>
>> In all cases, I get an error window:
>>
>>
>>
>> ======================================================
>>
>> Problem:
>>
>>
>>
>> The following specific error(s) occurred when executing
>>
>> PERFORM-ACTION-GET-ENTRY “$1$” *(or $1$, <hard coded entry ID>, “<hard
>> coded entry ID>”* *depending on the call I am trying)*
>>
>>
>>
>> Hint:
>>
>>
>>
>> Press Details to display the error message
>>
>>
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> The system cannot find the file specified.
>>
>> ======================================================
>>
>>
>>
>> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>>
>>
>>
>> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>>
>> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>>
>>
>>
>> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>>  _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to