Hi,
The suffix solution seems very dirty to me. A quick fix most likely, as it did
not need GUI changes.
It would be easy to do a conversion during upgrade, or a tool to add the
property to any FLTR with the suffix.
You can add properties as columns in DevStudio, so it could still be visible
when reviewing you filter list.
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Ask the Remedy Licensing Experts (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12/13):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
> Harsh,
>
>
>
> I agree with Fred & Rick, it makes more sense to rather have it as a property
> rather than only as some text appended to the name, but you would need to have
> BMC automate keeping both conventions going to make it backward compatible
> with existing workflow.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Theo
>
>
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Westbrock
> Sent: 03 March 2015 18:56
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: The ~! for filter names
>
>
>
> **
>
> Harsh-
>
>
>
> You would still have the option of using that naming convention to indicate
> the phasing but I think it makes more sense to make it a property of the
> filter rather than relying on the filter name to trigger the phasing.
> There’s no reason we can’t set the phasing in a filter property and also
> append `! to the name (or whatever other naming syntax you wish, there might
> be something else that makes more sense).
>
>
>
> -Rick
>
>
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Harsh
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 7:31 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: The ~! for filter names
>
>
>
> **
>
> Yes, it is there `! , and i don't think it would be better to remove `!, as a
> developer i am not at all wishing to open each filter and check if it is
> overriding the filter phasing. Better i can guess from its name.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Harsh
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Grooms, Frederick W <frederick.w.gro...@xo.com
> <mailto:frederick.w.gro...@xo.com> > wrote:
>
> The 2 are not exactly the same. The release pending causes the Phase 2
> actions to happen, then comes back to this Filter. The `! causes this filter
> to run in Phase 1
>
> I put an idea out in the Developer Communities to change needing `!
> https://communities.bmc.com/ideas/3639
>
> Vote it up ;)
>
> Fred
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> ] On Behalf Of Joe
> D'Souza
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:20 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: The ~! for filter names
>
> Still there as far as I know as well.
>
> They have an additional PROCESS action though that was added somewhere
> around AR System 6.3 days that mimics that so that the code is not dependant
> on the name of the Filter. The action is RELEASE-APPLICATION-PENDING.
>
> Cheers
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> ] On Behalf Of
> Mitcham, Ross
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 1:24 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: Re: The ~! for filter names
>
> It should still be there, but it is `! not ~! (not sure if this is a typo)
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Ross Mitcham
> Lead Product Developer
> Direct
>
> +1 905.707.3534 <tel:%2B1%20905.707.3534>
>
> 50 Minthorn Bvld.
> Suite 200
> Markham, ON L3T 7X8
> Canada
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> ] On Behalf Of Ray
> Gellenbeck
> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 1:14 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
> Subject: The ~! for filter names
>
> Was the ~! function deprecated out in 8.x?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> <http://www.arslist.org>
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks & regards
> “Harsh Chaudhary”
> "Impatience never commanded success"
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
