Dear Haiying Li, DDA code is not part of ARTS, and never has been. But it is well suited to precalculate particle single scattering properties. There are also existing databases with precalculated scattering properties, some of which are discussed in this article: doi:10.5194/amt-8-1913-2015. We are currently working on a new database that will be more tightly integrated with ARTS.
Best wishes, Stefan > On 16 Jan 2017, at 07:58, Oliver Lemke <oliver.le...@uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > > > Forwarded to mailing list after I accidentally deleted it from the moderation > queue (got lost in the spam): > >> From: 李海英 <lihy1...@163.com> >> Subject: about the DDA method >> Date: 14 January 2017 at 08:14:24 CET >> To: arts_users邮箱 <arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de> >> >> >> dear professor >> I am a PhD student of Xidian University, China. I have been studying the >> ARTS model for a while, and I read an article named of "Development of an RT >> model for frequencies between 200 and 1000 GHz", and the single scattering >> of ice crystals are calculated using both DDA method and T-matrix, and all >> of them corresponds to an ARTS tool. The string "DDA" cannot be found in the >> latest ARTS user. So, my confusion is that is the DDA method still been used >> in the ARTS model, if not, is t-matrix the only way to deal with the >> scattering of ice crystals? >> thank you very much for your help >> yours sincerely >> Haiying Li > > > > _______________________________________________ > arts_users.mi mailing list > arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de > https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi _______________________________________________ arts_users.mi mailing list arts_users.mi@lists.uni-hamburg.de https://mailman.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/mailman/listinfo/arts_users.mi
