Skip,
I'm limited in my Supreme Court knowledge, but that's always been known as O'Connor's (and Rehnquist's) style with cases argued before the court. They come up with off the wall questions to try to stump the attorneys before them, as a way to decide whether they actually believe in what they are saying, or just arguing for the sake of argument. --- In [email protected], "SkipDragon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Someone please tell me just how in hell how government could decide > whether a replacement use will be a successful venture. > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
