Typo - I meant perhaps the board is "not" made up of the most 
accomplished business executives who now reside in this town.




--- In [email protected], "asburycouple" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I totally agree, and definitely see both sides here.  For me, I 
look 
> at what this board inherited - an absolutely horrible situation by 
> anyone's standards.  The city was on the verge of bankrupcy - 
> literally within days when the redevelopment deal was signed.  
There 
> were legal issues surrounding the waterfront area that had been 
> ongoing for years and had stalled any progress what-so-ever.  The 
> town had for the most part a horrible reputation throughout the 
> state.  Cookman was a ghost town.
> 
> Rather than play armchair quarterback at this point and point out 
> everywhere the redevelopment agreement sucks, I look back and see 
> that there were very limited options for the board at that point.  
> The most likely scenario other than the current redevelopment 
> agreement was bankrupcy for the city.  I feel much better about 
> where we are than I would have had we declared bankrupcy.  And 
> looking objectively at the situation at the time Asbury Partners 
> assumed a tremendous risk as well.  This was no sure thing for 
them 
> either.  There were no guarantees in Asbury Park, and history 
> demonstrated that things here often did not work out for anyone in 
> this town including those who invested in redevelopment with the 
> belief they could make it work.  
> 
> Do I think I could have negotiated a better deal for 
redevelopment, 
> facing the same challenges that faced the board 4 years ago?  The 
> answer is I don't know.  Because no one really knows whether 
another 
> deal was possible that would have been markedly better as the city 
> faced looming bankrupcy and too many challengs to even begin to 
> articulate.  It's too easy to second guess every individual aspect 
> of this deal without looking at the big picture of the deal and 
the 
> reality of just how challenging things were for everyone involved 
> when the deal was signed.  
> 
> Perhaps the current board is made up of the most accomplished 
> business executives who now reside in this town.  But for me 
> personally it comes down to this one question:  
> 
> Is Asbury Park a better place to live now than it was 4 years 
ago?  
> 
> I'm not sure how anyone could answer that question other than a 
> resounding "Yes".  Things here are far from perfect - but every 
> aspect of the city is making some sort of progress.  Our 
reputation 
> is has gone from one of the worst cities in NJ to one of rebirth 
and 
> optimism.  We've gone from the brink of bankrupcy to being a 
credit-
> worthy community.  Our infrastructure is being rebuilt.  
> Redevelopment is happening.  Even the war on drugs is now being 
> fought rather than just tolerated.  Think about how much progress 
> that is in just four years.  
> 
> I think the board needs to get credit for the progress that has 
been 
> made.  It happened on their watch.  They did so much to facilitate 
> it.  And they would have been the ones taking the heat had it all 
> fallen apart.
> 
> Again I do understand both perspectives.  But for me atleast, so 
> much positive has happened on their watch.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to