See my later post Gerry. The contract couldn't be drafted before the election (I went away for 10 days right before the election). The issue became moot after May 10, so there is nothing to show you (see my post you copied below - it was part of my offer). The election contingency was discussed in the negotiation; no way I would have signed the contract before the election without it.
--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Tommy can I see a copy of that contract. > Jerry > In a message dated 5/20/2005 2:50:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Can't speak for those projects, but some people were awaiting the > outcome of the election before investing. Perhaps those projects > were doing the same. This even came up in the campaign itself. The > anti-redevelopment talk of some candidates was enough to make > investors nervous. > > I put an offer on a property here in AP, and insisted upon > an "election contingency" that would allow me to void the contract > if I did not like the outcome of the election. > > When newspapers recently wrote about the importance of stability and > continutity in government, it wasn't just space filler. That was a > very important issue for investors. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
