I could have asked 'come out', but I know that would be misinterpreted.
--- In [email protected], "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Come clean? I don't recall the issue of who I am ever coming up, > Skip. > > > --- In [email protected], "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I'm glad you enjoyed that; now why don't you come clean and sign > your > > contributions? I assume from Dan's letters that you are in fact > Tom > > DeSeno. > > > > --- In [email protected], "bluebishop82" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Now that's funny Skip! See, we can rib each other a little bit > > > without actully being insulting. > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > `As for you calling me an "ambulance chaser,"' > > > > I have it on good authority that Tommy, BB82 or whoever in > hell > > > this > > > > is, limits himself to chasing monster trucks; and you can take > > > that to > > > > the bank. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "bluebishop82" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Nice backtrack. Now you're just projecting your lack of > > > > > understanding on to me. My original post made no mention of > the > > > > > bankruptcy clause. It was your original post that tried to > make > > > it > > > > > seem the redevelopment rights would stay clear of the > bankruptcy > > > > > court (that was the point of your post), which you clearly > > > concede > > > > > now that it won't. > > > > > > > > > > As for your assertion that the lawyers you work with > > > > > aren't "practicing in AP" (as if that is beneath them), > well, > > > that's > > > > > just you pointing out again your disdain for people from > Asbury > > > Park > > > > > and this area in general, which is how we met in the first > > > place, > > > > > isn't it? > > > > > > > > > > As for you calling me an "ambulance chaser," when my > adversary > > > has > > > > > nothing left to retort with but name calling, that's when I > know > > > > > I've won the arguement. > > > > > > > > > > By the way, if you read that old triCity article, you will > find > > > I > > > > > never called into question your abilities in your field. I > > > wouldn't > > > > > do that. I made the point that I thought you would have a > > > conflict > > > > > on one matter: valuing the triangle property, due to your > > > comments > > > > > about (and obvious feeling toward) the parties. Having a > > > conflict > > > > > on a case is not a knock against your abilities. I've been > > > > > conflicted out of a number of cases for a variety of reasons. > > > > > > > > > > Oh, before I forget. There was a mistake of law in your > > > question to > > > > > Jim Aaron - Bankruptcy Court is a court of equity, not law. > > > > > > > > > > Look, you aren't outmatched in this conversation because law > is > > > my > > > > > field. You're just outmatched by a guy from AP. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "dfsavgny" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "bluebishop82" > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I never said it was "no good." I've read your bragging > > > about > > > > > the > > > > > > > lawyers you deal with being the best there is. Go ask > one > > > of > > > > > them > > > > > > > what proceedings you could expect from creditors if this > > > > > provision > > > > > > > is triggered. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom, there is always litigation, that's why there are > lawyers. > > > > > You're > > > > > > good at sound bites but short on proof as always. I hope > you > > > go > > > > > into > > > > > > court with more than that. Say what you will but your > original > > > > > post > > > > > > made it seem as if the clause was not worth the paper it > was > > > > > written > > > > > > on. I am sure you are aware that any creditors would see > the > > > > > agreement > > > > > > and see that the city has a reverter clause. Also, > creditors > > > have > > > > > the > > > > > > right to remedy any defaults but all have to be approved > by > > > the > > > > > city. > > > > > > I will defer to you on bankruptcy law. Be sure that the > > > attorneys > > > > > I > > > > > > work with do not chase ambulances or practice in AP or > Toms > > > River. > > > > > In > > > > > > the end you are right that there will be litigation, but > > > > > litigation is > > > > > > not necessrily bad. Sometimes it is the only choice when > one > > > party > > > > > to > > > > > > a contract will not perform. Your rationale says that one > > > should > > > > > not > > > > > > ask that party to perform as agreed to in the contract > lest > > > they > > > > > > litigate. That is my very early point about having a gun > when > > > they > > > > > > other guy knows you'll never pull the trigger. Do you know > > > where > > > > > that > > > > > > gun will land up? You'll need a proctologist to remove it. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
