`" 11389 he said: "I have to ask when you intend to disclose your latest and apparently primary occupation, that of mouth piece for The Fishman? His intent: To accuse me of getting money from Fishman (going so far as to say it is my "occupation"). 11393 he said: "As to "proof that he doesn't pay"; you and I know that The Partners screwed your nephew in their `haunted house' scheme, Larry stiffed you for a copy of a print of yours and stuck you with the tab for a lunch he invited you to in part to thank you for your services providing him that print." His intent: To accuse me of never getting money from Fishman. Behold the contradiction: First post I'm paid by Fishman, second post I'm not."'
Tommy, Tommy, Tommy when will you learn? You are working for the Fish; you're his latest and greatest mouthpiece; good for both of you, you deserve each other. Please note that comment is circa 2005; specifically 8/17/05. The subsequent charge, that he `screwed your nephew etc.' is circa 2003; when those events transpired and, you're gonna have some `splainin' to do with Larry; you Tom DeSeno uttered them to me. Hey if JJ is judging feel free to give this one to BB82 (BizarreBullshiter); I did in fact `contradict' myself; though I must appeal to the court for leniency, BB and his nephew were screwed, Tommy failed to learn from that lesson and now happily does Fish bidding for a few pence. --- In [email protected], "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to reveal here how Skip will change his facts and his > conclusions from post to post, which is why you can't trust what he > says. He doesn't really believe in anything; he just types whatever > he thinks will help him at that very moment, even if he contradicts > himself from just moments before. Keep in mind he did both of the > following posts within 8 hours of each other: > > In message 11389 he said: > > "I have to ask when you intend to disclose your latest and > apparently primary occupation, that of mouth piece for The Fishman? > > His intent: To accuse me of getting money from Fishman (going so > far as to say it is my "occupation"). > > In post 11393 he said: > > "As to "proof that he doesn't pay"; you and I know that The Partners > screwed your nephew in their `haunted house' scheme, Larry stiffed > you for a copy of a print of yours and stuck you with the tab for a > lunch he invited you to in part to thank you for your services > providing him that print." > > His intent: To accuse me of never getting money from Fishman. > > Behold the contradiction: First post I'm paid by Fishman, second > post I'm not. > > Most people when confronted with the above would just admit the > contradiction and humbly move on. Not Skip. Instead he will leave a > post with flowery words and insults, while avoiding his > contradiction. > > You can't argue with a person who won't admit to a transgression > that is right in front of him. He does not know humility. Your > argument with him will never end. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
