--- .
>
> Well that's the crux of the problem isn't it? Investment in the CH
> and Asbury Partners' refusal to do so. While all of this discussion
> of whether CH can turn a profit as a venue is interesting, it is
> besides the point. What is really germane is that regardless of
> whether it can turn a profit, the agreement calls for it to be
> restored. CH, Casino, pr the pavillions cannot be considered
> individually or separate from the entire waterfront. Why did Asbury
> Partners think they were getting such a good deal? That was the
quid
> pro quo to restore the waterfront buildings. The only problem was
> that the deal the city thought it made wasn't made and wasn't in a
> strong enough agreement. The council was hoodwinked and now they
> know it. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
BTW,
> the Tiki Bar run properly should do $20-$40G's on a weekend, that
of
> course means putting some of the other pieces together. There is a
> ton of money to be made on the boardwalk, in the Casino and CH if
> you know what you are doing. Asbury Partners and this city do not.
>
you are absoutley correct, and i am sure the tiki bar is doing that
but it is not owned by the partnership, but by one of the partners
under one of many llc. the boardwalk done properly would be a gold
mine, but they are not capable or flexible give me the money they
have wasted on bs paintings, ugly shrubs, terrible promo and
entertainment{shakespeare on the beach aint going to cut it}and we
would be on the way back.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
