Eminent domain must be bridled
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 05/3/06
Lillian and Louis Anzalone have lived in their white bungalow on 
Ocean Terrace in Long Branch, a block away from the beach, for 46 
years. Frances T. DeLuca's family has owned homes on the same street 
since 1918. Their residences are among 36 private properties Long 
Branch wants to seize -- using its power of eminent domain, taking 
property for public use - for redevelopment of the area into 
oceanfront condominiums.

As highlighted in the Press' three-day series "Private 
Property/Public Gain: The Battle Over Eminent Domain," which 
concluded Tuesday, this property rights campaign is playing out most 
forcefully in Long Branch. Mayor Adam Schneider calls the use of 
eminent domain "a tool of last resort." But he says the area where 
the Anzalones and DeLucas live is blighted, one of the criteria 
under the state's developer-friendly redevelopment law. So, the city 
is seeking to condemn the properties of 24 of the 36 homeowners who 
have not agreed to sell to the developer of Beachfront North Phase 
II.

The homes along Marine Terrace, Ocean Terrace and Seaview Avenue are 
not blighted. It is an area of small, well-kept houses. It is 
morally reprehensible for Long Branch to force the people who live 
there out of their homes. They have stayed with the city through 
good times and bad. Casting them aside is no way to say "thank you." 
Schneider should renegotiate the city's contract with the developer 
and see that the plan is redesigned so that the developer can 
maximize his profits without interfering with this established 
neighborhood.

Eminent domain should not be applied for economic development at the 
expense of owner-occupied residences or businesses. It's not fair to 
residents or merchants -- taxpayers all - who have devoted their 
lives to the municipality.

The battle that pits property rights against economic development is 
not isolated to Long Branch. It is a national issue. As detailed in 
the series, it is also being fought along the Jersey Shore in Asbury 
Park, Neptune and Neptune City.

In Asbury Park, Araxy Gokberk fears that her three-story house on 
Sixth Avenue, which her parents bought 50 years ago, will be 
targeted for the city's waterfront redevelopment project. It would 
be just as wrong for master developer Asbury Partners to move 
against her home as it is for Long Branch to try to displace the 
Anzalones and DeLucas.

Development advocates have been heartened by the U.S. Supreme Court 
ruling last year in a case from New London, Conn. That 5-to-4 ruling 
extended the traditional definition of public use under eminent 
domain -- generally roads, bridges, schools, hospitals -- to 
anything serving the greater public good, improving the economy and 
generating new tax revenue. That's far too broad.

The New London ruling has put eminent domain on the national agenda, 
too. New Jersey is among 40 states that are considering or have 
enacted legislative reforms of eminent domain laws. The House of 
Representatives has passed a bill restricting federal funds to 
states or towns that use eminent domain for commercial development.

New Jersey's Legislature must act to bring equity to the state's 
redevelopment law. The definition of blighted land must be clear. 
And the law must provide standards of "just compensation" to 
property owners whose homes are already targeted and in those rare 
occasions when eminent domain is justified.

The tool of eminent domain cited by Schneider is really a hammer 
over the heads of the homeowners. Once their home is targeted, their 
property value is frozen. All they can do is negotiate with the 
developer based on the current use of the land. That, too, is 
unfair. It's unlikely they can find a replacement home for that 
price and they can't afford to buy one of the million-dollar condos 
that would rise on their property.

For the Anzalones, the $304,000 appraised value of their oceanfront 
home won't go far. "I could not build a garage for a bicycle for 
that price," Louis Anzalone said, perhaps exaggerating to make a 
strong point. For DeLuca, the prospect of condemnation is an assault 
on the area's history. "You need to leave a little version of what 
the Jersey Shore looked like before they turn it into Staten 
Island," she said.

These and the other threatened families in Long Branch, Asbury Park 
and elsewhere grew up there and deserve to remain there.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to