Hi Stuart!
Here's a little idea:
With release 0.3 of dblatex it is now possible to set the table width
using a processing instruction. [1] This means that you now can have
tables with a width other than 100% using the dblatex backend without
having to use
the "pageunits=pt" workaround [2].
>From what I can see the change required to support this is adding:
<?dblatex table-width="{width}"?>
to the [table] section in docbook.conf where you today have:
# DocBook XSL Stylesheets custom processing instructions.
<?dbhtml table-width="{width}"?>
<?dbfo table-width="{width}"?>
The width syntax for dblatex should be the same as for the others. [3]
Unfortunately I'm not sure if adding this could cause regressions for
other backends...?
1. http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/doc/release-notes/sec-changes-03.html
2.
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/faq.html#_why_don_8217_t_tables_generated_by_dblatex_obey_the_width_attribute
3. http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/doc/manual/ch03s05.html#sec-table-width
Thanks for AsciiDoc!
--
Gustav Broberg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
