Consider the following asciidoc snippet:
:t: tesr1
(this is a `{t}') test
this is a `{t}' test
which in your current asciidoc renders as:
// begin asciidoc snippet
==================
:t: tesr1
(this is a `{t}') test
this is a `{t}' test
==================
// end asciidoc snippet
The paragraph above is messed up because the first single quote
character is misinterpreted as the beginning of an "emphasis"
quotation.
I meant to have the two "tesr1" strings agove (which is an expansion
of attribute "t") to be singly quoted;
instead, asciidoc renders the string
) test this is a `tesr1
in emphasized format instead.
The correct rendering should have been like this:
==================
(this is a `tesr1') test
this is a `tesr1' test
==================
>From the [quotes] section in asciidoc.conf I see that the
++emphasis++-style quotation precedes the ++singlequoted++ entry,
so emphasis is processed before single quotation.
It appears to me that the "singlequoted" should be processed first.
I verified that reversing the order of the two quotations fix the
problem with my test sentence above.
But I am not an asciidoc expert, so I want to know if there is an
issue by swapping the two
(in the original asciidoc 8.6.4, this entails swapping lines 76 and 77
in asciidoc.conf).
One thing we note right away is that the singly-quoted emphasis like
This is `supposed to be an 'emphasis' inside the singly quoted
piece'
of text.
will not work anymore. The workaround is to use underscore rather than
single aphostrophe, i.e.,
This is `supposed to be an _emphasis_ inside the singly quoted
piece'
of text.
Any comment?
Thanks,
Wirawan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
