On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Scott Chacon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Dag Wieers <[email protected]> wrote:
I think it is a missed opportunity that the project never used .adoc (or
something more convenient than .asciidoc). Would have been useful for syntax
highlighters as well.
Most projects I know simply use .txt :-/
I'll try to get 'asc' and 'adoc' in as recognized extensions on github
at least. I think 'asc' is used by O'Reilly for their asciidoc flow,
so at least there is some precedent.
Hi Scott,
Any progress on this ?
We would like to use the asciidoc integration in Github more extensively
but hate to rename everything to .asciidoc, in fact I would prefer to use
.txt so if Github would understand the file content somehow (maybe using
vim inline comments) that would be even better.
If you created a feature request, please provide me with a reference.
Otherwise I will do a feature request.
--
-- dag wieers, [email protected], http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, [email protected], http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
