Hi Lionel, I've added some documentation :-)
On 12 June 2011 22:52, Lionel Orry <[email protected]> wrote: > Impressive ! > After all that time looking a the XSL language with a fish look, unable to > decide what to start with and how to organize stuff (I was trying to dissect > the current docbook-xsl-stylesheets distribution to see if I could fork some > text-output backend like manpages, but it turns out lots, lots of code and > parameters must be written/taken into account), I am eventually very tempted > to try other solutions. ElementTree was already suggested by Sebastian > Pipping and well, why not... Yeah, fish look describes my relationship to XML, especially XSL, I am firmly of the belief that humans shouldn't write XML, machines should. Note ElementTree has some subtleties that I have described in the documentation. > I'm just still too bad at python, I feel more comfortable with Ruby. But we Sorry but Perl made me hate decorated languages :-) Hope the documentation helps. > have here a python software, so a more or less python biased community (at > least contributors/devs if not asciidoc users) so it's a good point as well. > I'll look at it deeper but so far, the code seems very clean, well > documented, so I may get my fingers into that sooner or later. See the documentation for how to make local changes and additions without having to merge changes made to the basic program. Cheers Lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
