Hi Stuart,

After reading the thread you pointed to I think the best solution is
updating the DIV reference.  Here's the result of a diff:


$ diff -u a/asciidoc.js b/asciidoc.js
--- a/asciidoc.js       Fri Apr 22 15:29:44 2011
+++ b/asciidoc.js       Mon Aug 15 15:53:07 2011
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
   var i;
   for (i = 0; i < toc.childNodes.length; i++) {
     var entry = toc.childNodes[i];
-    if (entry.nodeName == 'DIV'
+    if (entry.nodeName == 'div'
      && entry.getAttribute("class")
      && entry.getAttribute("class").match(/^toclevel/))
       tocEntriesToRemove.push(entry);
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
   var entriesToRemove = [];
   for (i = 0; i < noteholder.childNodes.length; i++) {
     var entry = noteholder.childNodes[i];
-    if (entry.nodeName == 'DIV' && entry.getAttribute("class") ==
"footnote")
+    if (entry.nodeName == 'div' && entry.getAttribute("class") ==
"footnote")
       entriesToRemove.push(entry);
   }
   for (i = 0; i < entriesToRemove.length; i++) {


Cheers,
Will

On Aug 18, 5:10 am, Stuart Rackham <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Will
>
> On 16/08/11 02:58, Will wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I found the TOC&  footnotes generator with asciidoc 8.6.5 under
> > Windows XP sp3 duplicates items (TOC entries or footnotes) if an XHTML
> > document is large or slow to load.
>
> > To replicate you can create a document that embeds (using the data-uri
> > scheme) a large image.  As the image takes some time to load in the
> > browser (tested with FF 6.0 beta and Chrome 13.0.782.112) it has the
> > same effect as a large document.  Example (image is 4560 x 3052 px&
> > 510 x 510 ppi):
>
> > = AsciiDoc TOC test
>
> > == Lorem ipsum
>
> > Lorem ipsum dolor sit ametfootnote:[lobortis id venenatis sed],
> > consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras consecteturfootnote:[vel sagittis
> > mauris iaculis in] lobortis mauris, id malesuada mi sollicitudin eget.
> > Nullam magna ante, consectetur vitae scelerisque quis, porttitor
> > volutpat sapien. Duis at purus nec arcu luctus luctus vitae eu neque.
> > Praesent vel est vel diam auctor scelerisque. Nam nec nulla eget metus
> > dapibus rhoncus.
>
> > image::./jimmy.jpg[alt="Zoso",width="800"]
>
> > == Cras consectetur
>
> > Etiam nulla purus, pellentesque eget ultrices vitae, consequat vitae
> > massa. Cras imperdiet, justo eget ultricies congue, neque urna rutrum
> > quam, sit amet egestas ante nisi sit amet arcu. Nam posuere velit sed
> > magna sodales ornare. Quisque at elementum ligula. Etiam aliquam,
> > tortor a vulputate imperdiet, nibh justo pellentesque tellus, eu
> > gravida massa dui sed nulla. Aliquam sodales elit a nunc egestas
> > placerat.
>
> > == Nullam magna ante
>
> > Donec pretium tincidunt semper. Phasellus congue ornare tortor eu
> > semper. Phasellus iaculis tempus lorem id pellentesque. Morbi
> > elementum commodo nisl vel euismod. Aliquam ac nibh quis sapien
> > tristique lobortis. Quisque ligula enim, tempus a aliquam sit amet,
> > tempor sed est. Ut sit amet augue lacus. Etiam tortor est, pretium
> > eget vulputate at, blandit eu tortor. Fusce eget rutrum purus. Aenean
> > est eros, suscipit at dignissim condimentum, suscipit id mi.
>
> > Rendering:
>
> > python C:\bin\asciidoc-8.6.5\asciidoc.py --verbose --attribute data-
> > uri --attribute icons --attribute numbered --backend=xhtml11 --out-
> > file="L:\el\sa\_asciidoc\toc-test\asciidoc-toc-test.xhtml" --attribute
> > toc "L:\el\sa\_asciidoc\toc-test\asciidoc-toc-test.txt"
>
> > It seems the issue is with the code that drops existing elements
> > before recreating, as it references the elements by tag name "DIV"
> > instead of "div".  Editing lines 71&  117 does the trick.
>
> > Alternatively, it can be changed to only build the TOC/footnotes once
> > (after the document has loaded) by commenting out lines 178&  182.
> > Increasing the interval set on line 182 (e.g. from 500 to 3000) has
> > the same effect but is probably pointless.
>
> Thanks for spotting this and figuring out the fixes, which fix do you think is
> best? Could you please post a diff of the changes (I'm not familar with this
> code). The change was made here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/asciidoc/source/detail?r=327c1c7ff4da355f2bf...
>
> and followed considerable discussion:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc/browse_thread/thread/5a7fe64f...
>
> Cheers, Stuart
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Will

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"asciidoc" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.

Reply via email to