On Fri, 4 May 2012 19:34:55 +1000 Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Heh, if you are on Linux, just let your package manager look after > making it work and just use it, ignore the fact that it happens to be > Java. Basically XSLT/FOP is more standards compliant than dblatex in > most cases but its style is much more sparse. Well, I really liek to avoid Java stuff. > I'm surprised, IIUC Latex can do text wrapped around images, at least > to some extent. I guess you would know more on that. If so, why > dblatex doesn't use it I don't know, but then I don't know what Latex > is involved, maybe its complicated. I must say this sounds as dealbreaker. :-( I'm going to try restructuredText and see how it copes with floating images. > Looks like it hasn't been updated since 8.4 timeframe. Too bad...Otoh, it might (if we stay with AsciiDoc) be worth fixing it. Sincerely, Gour -- A person who has given up all desires for sense gratification, who lives free from desires, who has given up all sense of proprietorship and is devoid of false ego — he alone can attain real peace. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
