Hi,
thank you for AsciiDoc. :)
I just wondering if it is possible to define IDs for glossary terms.
Usually, if you want to write a glossary, you end up with this:
[[glossary]]
= Glossary =
[glossary]
Foo::
This is a foo term
Bar::
This is a bar term
If you use the DocBook backend, you end up with this code:
<glossary id="glossary">
<title>Glossary</title>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>Foo</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<simpara>This is a foo term</simpara>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>Bar</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<simpara>This is a bar term</simpara>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
</glossary>
This works. However, I was not able to get IDs on a <glossentry> element. I
tried this:
[[foo_term]]
Foo::
This is a foo term
This didn't work. I would have expected to get this fragment:
<glossentry id="foo_term">
<glossterm>Foo</glossterm>
Does anybody know a method how to do this?
Thanks,
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"asciidoc" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asciidoc/-/rB5MPB8NFwoJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
