On Saturday, February 2, 2013 5:08:08 AM UTC-5, Lex Trotman wrote: > > On 2 February 2013 19:25, inchoatus <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > What's your thinking about just putting whatever docbook requires to > > generate the empty section? > > Empty sections are *not* valid in docbook, however you generate them > xmllint will complain. Asciidoc is doing what you told it to, it > generates empty sections, but you told it to do something that is not > valid docbook so xmllint complains. >
I guess the OP wants to know if there is any tricks to make xmllint/docbook into thinking that the section is not empty. E.g., for html rendering, a Passthrough Block containing would make the section *seems* not empty. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
