Dear all, *Context:*
I (and other people, for example: http://bugs.debian.org/656736) had the issue of the modification of the "Last updated" field at the bottom of the generated page that gives the modification date of the page (not the revision date) when you use asciidoc to generate HTML pages. For example, I'm using a central git repo for the text pages and generate the html pages using a batch. When you update repo that is used for the batch it can be at another date than the date of the revision, so the "Last updated" field at the end of the page can be confusing. *My proposition:* I've made a little patch *for the english version only* and opened an issue on the google repo, but I'm not sure it's the right place to do this. Here's the url of the issue: https://code.google.com/p/asciidoc/issues/detail?id=29 What I did in the patch is I used a new standard attribute named "footer-style" (you can change it if you want!) that could take 3 values: - *default* :or not defined, same as currently) - *none* : not displaying the footer-text section - *revdate* : displays the revision date instead of the source file modification date Any other value will display only the version number from the footer-text section(if defined). *My questions:* Would this feature be useful for someone else? Do you think it's a good idea to include it in the official version? Thanks in advance, Joseph -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
