Hehehe, I know... I knew about list with +, but not about *labeled lists* with + :D
Em quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 20h40min56s UTC-3, Lex Trotman escreveu: > > On 30 May 2014 06:21, Eduardo Santana <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > Thanks a lot!!! > > > > So simple, I always wanted to do this. To use a single openblock with a > > labeled list: > > > > label:: > > + > > -- > > many things here. > > -- > > > > I didn't know we could use like this. This is not documented. :) > > > http://asciidoc.org/userguide.html#X15 :-D > > Cheers > Lex > > > git grep -e "^--$" -B 2 > > > > > > > > > > Em quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 11h18min55s UTC-3, Lex Trotman > escreveu: > >> > >> On 30 May 2014 00:11, Eduardo Santana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > It doesn't build. > >> > > >> > Here's the error: > >> > > >> > wip.xml:145: element listitem: validity error : Element listitem > content > >> > does not follow the DTD, expecting (calloutlist | glosslist | > bibliolist > >> > | > >> > itemizedlist | orderedlist | segmentedlist | simplelist | > variablelist | > >> > caution | important | note | tip | warning | literallayout | > >> > programlisting > >> > | programlistingco | screen | screenco | screenshot | synopsis | > >> > cmdsynopsis > >> > | funcsynopsis | classsynopsis | fieldsynopsis | constructorsynopsis > | > >> > destructorsynopsis | methodsynopsis | formalpara | para | simpara | > >> > address > >> > | blockquote | graphic | graphicco | mediaobject | mediaobjectco | > >> > informalequation | informalexample | informalfigure | informaltable | > >> > equation | example | figure | table | msgset | procedure | sidebar | > >> > qandaset | task | anchor | bridgehead | remark | highlights | > abstract | > >> > authorblurb | epigraph | indexterm | beginpage)+, got () > >> > >> Yes because you have an empty list item, see the (), like I said > >> > >> xxx:: > >> -- > >> blah > >> -- > >> > >> the open block is *not* part of the list item, it ends the list > >> because it is another block. > >> > >> By ending the list it leaves the last list item empty, and thats what > >> xmllint is complaining about. > >> > >> Add the plus like I said, it builds fine. > >> > >> xxx:: > >> + > >> -- > >> blah > >> -- > >> > >> Cheers > >> Lex > >> > >> > </listitem> > >> > > >> > > >> > Here's the doocbook xml code: > >> > > >> > <chapter id="_this_works"> > >> > <title>This works</title> > >> > <variablelist> > >> > <varlistentry> > >> > <term> > >> > It will NOT work > >> > </term> > >> > <listitem> > >> > </listitem> > >> > </varlistentry> > >> > </variablelist> > >> > <simpara>Text here.</simpara> > >> > <orderedlist numeration="arabic"><title>Block here</title> > >> > <listitem> > >> > <simpara> > >> > item > >> > </simpara> > >> > </listitem> > >> > <listitem> > >> > <simpara> > >> > item > >> > </simpara> > >> > </listitem> > >> > </orderedlist> > >> > <simpara>More text.</simpara> > >> > </chapter> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Em quinta-feira, 29 de maio de 2014 09h56min14s UTC-3, Lex Trotman > >> > escreveu: > >> >> > >> >> On 29 May 2014 22:43, Eduardo Santana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > When I have a Labeled list, and I want to start it with an > openblock > >> >> > it > >> >> > doesn't work: > >> >> > >> >> What do you mean by "doesn't work"? It produces no output, it > doesn't > >> >> look like you expect (which is?) or what? > >> >> > >> >> I'm guessing you mean the first case does not put the open block in > >> >> the labelled list item? > >> >> > >> >> That is expected, the open block is another block, it causes the end > >> >> of the list item. > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > It will NOT work:: > >> >> > >> >> Put a + here like you have in the next example and the open block is > >> >> considered part of the labelled list. > >> >> > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Text here. > >> >> > > >> >> > .Block here > >> >> > . item > >> >> > . item > >> >> > > >> >> > More text. > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > > >> >> > It will work:: > >> >> > Text here. > >> >> > + > >> >> > -- > >> >> > > >> >> > .Block here > >> >> > . item > >> >> > . item > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > + > >> >> > More text. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > It will work:: > >> >> > Text here. > >> >> > + > >> >> > .Block here > >> >> > . item > >> >> > . item > >> >> > + > >> >> > More text. > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >> > Groups > >> >> > "asciidoc" group. > >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > >> >> > send > >> >> > an > >> >> > email to [email protected]. > >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. > >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "asciidoc" group. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send > >> > an > >> > email to [email protected]. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. > >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "asciidoc" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
