Understood! I'll go ahead and remove the python2 only stuff from the repo so the repo adoption can happen. I'll probably also need to adjust the manpage paths to account for that too.
On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 6:03:58 PM UTC-7, Lex Trotman wrote: > > To explain my thoughts about a separate repo. One of the important > benefits of python 3 is that it handles Unicode properly in all > strings. But that may also mean some of the regular expressions in > Asciidoc and in the config files need changing to take advantage of > this. Also you have changed the configs with the base64 change. > > So it would be better to keep Asciidoc Python 2 separate and stable > and Asciidoc Python 3 in its own repo where such changes can be made > without constantly looking over your shoulder to see if it also works > on Python2. > > Some distros no longer distribute Python2 by default, so they won't > want to distribute the Asciidoc2 version by default. Having the > Asciidoc3 version in a repo by itself makes that easier. > > Finally, then the installer can be modified to put Asciidoc3 config in > a different directory (eg adding a 3 to it) so both versions can be > installed together if needed (for example when someone is porting > customisations). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
