As far as I know there is no rigourous syntax definition. Asciidoc is a highly context dependent language, so formal techniques like grammar specifications are difficult to apply to it since most are context free constructions.
Cheers Lex On 30 October 2016 at 05:52, rch <[email protected]> wrote: >> Where can I find that, a rigorous full syntax definition? > > This would be very helpful, especially if it has syntax diagrams; as per > http://bottlecaps.de/rr/ui > > I found these diagrams v. helpful in working through Douglas > Crockford's «Javascript The Good Parts» ; > > Examples now online at > > https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/javascript-the-good/9780596517748/ch02.html > > Richard H > > On 10/29/2016 04:02 PM, Jaime Tarrasa wrote: >> In Asciidoc user guide there is a footnote that says: >> >> "This is a rough structural guide, not a rigorous syntax definition" >> >> Where can I find that, a rigorous full syntax definition? > > > -- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "asciidoc" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
