El lunes, 10 de diciembre de 2018, 11:36:37 (UTC+1), Dan Allen escribió: > > First, I want to start off by saying I don't like your tone. Yelling at us > to do something isn't going to make us do it. > > Ok. Reading the text I see I was a little too aggressive and rude. I apologize.
Nevertheless my points are valid, and reading the comments I see what is the problem. You are messing two concepts:the software that implements the document format and the document format. The software may be open-source, but the document is not an open format document if there is no specification anywhere. I had written an implementation that parses a few things I needed. I wanted to implement the full specification and publish it as open-source, so it would enlarge the ecosystem. But I can't do that, or at least I'm going to, it if I have dig in a specification buried in the code. What I mean is: Discuss publicly the specification, write it down, and then everybody can implement it. Let asciidoctor be the reference implementation as Libreoffice is the current reference implementation of OpenDocument format. I think what I say is sensible. That is how usually software is written, I think. Asciidoc is not a piece of software, it is a document format. Come on, write the specification down. The current status doesn't encourage to write implementations. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
