Hi Daniel, faslpath looks... interesting but inflexible. It seems to make the package file equivalent to the system definition. I'm not sure how it would integrate. Are you suggesting
(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'foo :use-faslpath t) or something like that? thanks, On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:15 PM, Daniel Herring wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/faslpath/ > > While I don't think its right for everything, faslpath follows a > Java-style naming convention that does simplify the build process. > > How hard would it be to mix this in with ASDF? So project.asdf would > simply specify a (:faslpath toplevel.lisp) or something. > > Just a thought... I don't have time in the forseeable future to work > on > it. :( > > - Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > asdf-devel mailing list > asdf-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel -- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
