Attila Lendvai wrote: >> Maybe this would be a good time to push A-B-L into the ASDF repository? >> I've always been in favor of this, acnyway, since it's such a critical >> extension. IMO it would be great if anyone who had ASDF could also get >> A-B-L with no more work than a call to asdf:oos. > > why with an asdf:oos? why not just incorporate the functionality into > asdf? (possibly with such default values that preserve the current, > imho bad, practice of writing .fasl files all around the disk) > > just my 0.02, > I think what you suggest would be even better; I just hesitated to suggest it because there's been a tendency (I think correct) towards conservatism in ASDF development.
I have been using A-B-L for years, and I rely on it heavily. It has always been dead reliable for me. I'd be delighted to see it folded in. Especially since it relies on un-exported aspects of ASDF, and is so bound very tightly with the core of ASDF. R _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
