2009/10/23 Christophe Rhodes <cs...@cantab.net>:
> Faré <fah...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The cCLan list has apparently become the asdf-devel list.
>>
>> Is this still where the upstream for split-sequence is? If so, can
>> this patch be applied? If not, who's in charge?
>
> I guess I am, unless someone else wants to be.
>
OK.
>> --- old-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp 2009-10-22 20:10:35.110170150
>> -0400
>> +++ new-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp 2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499
>> -0400
>> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
>> ;;; * (split-sequence #\; ";oo;bar;ba;" :start 1 :end 9)
>> ;;; -> ("oo" "bar" "b"), 9
>>
>> +#+xcvb (module ())
>> +
>
> This is... no. Please find some way of not infesting code with
> build-related metainformation.
>
OK, I'll put this much-requested feature near the top of my TODO list.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Only presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right
to use the editorial "we."
-- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
