Attila Lendvai wrote: >> Is it a contingent fact about this system that we have an absolute pathname >> here, o have we somehow ended up with a function named >> foo-relative-pathname that returns absolute pathnames? > > > as far as i read it, 'relative' here refers to 'system' in the > meaning: give me a pathname that is relative to this system. >
So when the argument is the system itself, we get the absolute pathname, and for the components we get back a relative pathname. I suppose that's reasonable. best, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
