On 3/13/10 Mar 13 -1:12 PM, Faré wrote: > We could adopt the same algorithm as dpkg or rpm uses for comparing version. > > I once implemented it in shell script. Could do it in Lisp...
I confess to not really knowing this algorithm (I haven't built an RPM in a long time), nor having any guess about whether or not it would break previous :version dependencies. Anyone know how backward compatible this would be? > > [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] > I'll start exercising as soon as I'm into shape. > > > > > On 13 March 2010 12:38, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: >> The problem with -dev is that it violates the rules of ASDF's own >> VERSION-SATISFIES. >> >> Instead of -dev, we should use the z part of an x.y.z version number or >> change version-satisfies. >> >> "Nikodemus Siivola" <nikode...@random-state.net> wrote: >> >>> On 13 March 2010 16:36, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know how to automatically add a -dev outside releases. If you >>>> know how to do that, I'm all ears. >>> >>> I meant that first commit after a release -- say 2.0 -- sets the >>> version string to "2.1-dev" and after that it isn't touched till it's >>> time to release 2.1, at which point the -dev is manually removed. >>> After release the version string goes to "2.2-dev", etc. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- Nikodemus >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> asdf-devel mailing list >>> asdf-devel@common-lisp.net >>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel