On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote:
> Isn't this a job for > > (defmethod output-files asdf:around ((op operation) (c component) > ...) > > Wrapping around a method that undoes the change that another around method was doing looks definitely like a bad hack to me. Instead, providing an API for a method to advertise that no around method should mess with its output looks like something predictable and which does not lead to double-coding. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
