On 3/16/10 12:10 AM, james anderson wrote: > > most everything now has equivalent results.[1] > abcl now loads asdf, but the test fails anomalously. looking... > > > abcl fails in connection with a make-pathname operation of the sort > > (make-pathname :directory '(:relative) :name > "file" :type :unspecific :host nil :device nil)
I just fixed the failure of that form in [abcl trunk in r122549][1]. [1]: http://trac.common-lisp.net/armedbear/changeset/12549 […] > abcl has a distinct dislike for :unspecific pathname components. > > if the 1.636 code for merge-pathnames* is patched for abcl to always > use #'ununspecific, abcl constructs all systems and succeeds with the > same 1280/2080 directory/file matches as most of the other > implementations. I'll try to fix what I can in ABCL's implementation of :UNSPECIFC to get ASDF running. -- "A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there is nothing to compare to it now." _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
