On 19 March 2010 13:34, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thansk for the latest changes, they work like a charm now. > Glad to know it was "just" a package problem, and thanks to Robert for the diagnostic and to you for the explanation! I'm glad it didn't require any deep algorithmic fix.
> I have done something which I do not know whether it is a desired protocol. > Namely I have submitted patches for asdf-ecl.lisp using launchpad. > I did this because I always found it more convenient to have a look at the > ECL bug/patch tracker thank keeping track of the emails with patches and > remember whether they were committed. > Is it ok? Should I continue doing so with the following patches, such as > test cases, etc? > You did the right thing. It's better to file issues that way indeed. Committed as 1.656. We're drawing close to a ASDF 2 release. Is there anything missing in the documentation? The only piece of code which I think is missing, is support for configuration paths under Windows. Can you help with the configuration on Windows? What is the ECL equivalent of LispWorks' get-folder-path? Or if there isn't one builtin, how do I read a string entry from the registry? Can you test ASDF with ECL on Windows? Do these environment variables USERPROFILE and ALLUSERSPROFILE actually exist? [If users or vendors of other implementations are around, I'm soliciting the same services.] [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it for himself. — attributed to Galileo Galilei _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel