On 3/22/10 Mar 22 -10:04 PM, Faré wrote: > On 22 March 2010 22:35, Faré <fah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 22 March 2010 22:13, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: >>> Would it be possible to use the normal rewrite rules in the tests? >>> >> Sure but then we should either >> 1- always recompile asdf.lisp (as before) >> or >> 2- copy all the implementation directory detection into compile-asdf.lisp >> >> I'm leaning towards solution 1. >> > Meh, another problem that's not worth the time spent arguing it. > > I just committed something that will hopefully satisfy you: try load > asdf.fasl before you declare it OK. If loading fails, recompile. This > will hopefully catch the cases where the compiler changed > incompatibly. Then, use the "normal" :implementation redirection for > further FASLs. > > Please try again. Sorry for the noise. >
Brilliant, Faré, thanks. Working now. I will ticket the restart issue, because it is probably worth a check. I will see if I can make a test case. May just be a matter of us not having thought about the restarts being used under programmatic control (as in the test scripts) instead of interactively. Best, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
