On 2010-03-30, at 16:25 , Robert Goldman wrote: > On 3/30/10 Mar 30 -5:00 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: >> [...] > > Question: are we going to create a logical pathname translation for > just the system sources? Or should we create also something like > > CL-PPCRE;FASLS;*.*.*
if asdf decides to befried logical pathnames, it should allow the system to define its own mapping. > > in addition? This seems a little tricky, since it requires that we > hook > into the output name rewriting logic, but probably is The Right Thing. i had understood that the name rewriting logic is disabled for logical pathnames. which is as it should be. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
