> P.S. SBCL doesn't like the way asdf is compiled these days. > > * (load "asdf.lisp") > ... > ; in: LAMBDA NIL > ; (ASDF-UTILITIES:TRUENAMIZE ASDF::PATH) > ; > ; caught STYLE-WARNING: > ; undefined function: TRUENAMIZE > ; > ; compilation unit finished > ; Undefined function: > ; TRUENAMIZE > ; caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition > > ; (ASDF::FORMAT-ARGUMENTS ASDF::C) > ; > ; caught STYLE-WARNING: > ; undefined function: FORMAT-ARGUMENTS > > ; (ASDF::FORMAT-CONTROL ASDF::C) > ; > ; caught STYLE-WARNING: > ; undefined function: FORMAT-CONTROL > ... and many more >
SBCL doesn't like forward function definitions. There always were such functions. There might be a few more now. If you think that matters, we could add declaim ftype declarations. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] I don't program enough to be called a "programmer", and I don't non-program enough to be called a "non-programmer". So I'm a non-non-programmer, which, in intuitionistic logic, is weaker than a programmer. — Faré _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
