I think defsystem-depends-on fits the current interface better indeed. If no one complains today, I'll commit that as 1.705. (Not that I like the current interface, but it's not mine to design.)
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] May your desire to be correct overcome your desire to have been correct (which you were not, anyway). On 20 April 2010 04:10, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I pushed Juanjo's patch for :ASDF-DEPENDENCIES as 1.704, except that I >> renamed the feature :SYSTEM-DEPENDENCIES. Maybe it should have been >> :SYSTEM-DEPENDS-ON. Ahem. You tell me what you think. > > There is obviously a naming problem. > > :system-dependencies looks like the dependencies are equivalent to > :depends-on > :asdf-dependencies is ugly and does not give much information > > I could suggest, > > :meta-dependencies which is ugly, but may ring a bell (AMOP) > :defsystem-depends-on which is more like a sentence (current spirit) > > Juanjo > > -- > Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC > c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) > http://tream.dreamhosters.com _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
