> That said, the problem with *COMPILE-FILE-WARNING-BEHAVIOUR* > is that it's applied *after* COMPILE-FILE finished; it would > be much more intuitive if it failed right at the point > a warning is signaled. More intuitive because the message > of the warning would not be hidden somewhere in the backlog. > You're welcome to write the code that does that, e.g. as a handler-case in compile-file*. I won't do it, but if you do, I'll merge it.
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] As of vices, the State will let you devote your life to a false religion, encourage you to have too many kids, but ban use of psychedelics. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
