On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon < p...@informatimago.com> wrote:
> > No. Why? I mean, the separate components are bundled into a single > > asdf.lisp and this process is automated (make -f GNUmakefile > > asdf.lisp). There is no new testing burden. I am just advocating for > > some common sense in the ASDF codebase, organizing it in a readable > > and separated way. > > This is an alternative, indeed. > > asdf.lisp: $(ASDF_SOURCES) > clar asdf.lisp $(ASDF_SOURCES) > Indeed, eventually one should move my GNUmakefile line from using sed to using some Lisp implementation for repackaging asdf.lisp, ensuring a version number, etc. Incidentally, I am still amazed at how people here find a 4k source file manageable at all. No organization, functions spread throught the file, no clear navigation structure... If I have a directory with 10 small files, each one devoted to a separate and clear task, I know where I have to go to edit things for that particular topic. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel