Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > That said, whatever you're doing that is hitting that bug is probably > itself a mistake. There is no reason for you to ever use > (component-pathname (find-system ...)) Instead, you should be using > (system-relative-pathname ...) or some such thing.
Yup. In fact, I never used "(component-pathname (find-system ...))" (that was a simplification for the email). I hit the bug in a generic function doing (component-pathname <component>) in which <component> would occasionally be a system. -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Scientific site: http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
