On 5 February 2011 11:13, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote: > Fare, could you please go back to the other method I posted. This one does > not allow one to *CHANGE* the way COMPILE-FILE* behaves. > Do you need to change it dynamically? Why not just have a static #+ecl or something? I don't understand the use case.
> I profoundly dislike generic functions API precisely for this reason. There > is a base function, someone adds an around method and what about the next > around? How do you remove the previous one? > Since all this is ECL-specific (so far), I suppose you could use ADVISE, or whatever ECL-specific hooking mechanism exists, or delete-method calls. [ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ] Every technique is first developed, then used, important, obsolete, normalized, and finally understood. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
