On Sat, 21 May 2011, Faré wrote:
I wonder if ASDF shouldn't just define a ASDF-USER package that uses
ASDF and CL, instead of creating temporary packages every time.
Barring user demand, I'd leave it be. IMO, ASDF is near the limit of its
organic growth. Fundamental, breaking design changes are needed.
Wait, is that XCVB I hear calling? ;)
- Daniel
_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
