On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 18:41, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Faré <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Am I correct that I should assume :asdf-unix when :darwin is in the
>> *features*
>> even though :unix isn't?
>
> :darwin does imply Darwin operating system which does have '/'-separated
> pathnames and thus following your definition of :asdf-unix, the latter
> should be included in *features*.
>
OK. Robert, Juanjo, does the 2.017.5 I just pushed work for you?

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org

_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Reply via email to