> sorry for the lack of response in the last days -- little time to code left > and even less for reading mailing lists. > Ningún problema.
>> I see that your current ECL replaces si:: by ext: >> on a few symbols in its version of ASDF. >> Should I merge that into the official ASDF, >> or should I wait until you make a release of ECL? > > It would be nice to have them merged now, for I will forget to do that > afterwards. > OK. Will do. > I also wanted to ask: is there any kind of automated testing of ASDF already > set up? I am trying to fix ECL's compiler farm to do other tasks and do the > ones it does in a bit cleaner way and thought maybe testing ASDF with some > of the free compilers would be nice -- not a promise, but just a wish right > now :) > cd .../asdf make do-test lisp=ecl make do-test lisp=ecl-bytecodes make do-test-all lisps='ecl ecl-bytecodes' Actually, I think I'll soon rename do-test to test-lisp and do-test-all to test-lisps. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
