15.01.2012, 22:46, "Faré" <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 03:54, Anton Vodonosov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ECL offers two compiles: byte-compiler and lisp-to-C compiler. >> >> They produce incompatible .fasls > > At least in a recent ECL (I tested with a git checkout from November > 2011), they also should be using different extensions, .fas for the > usual compiler, and .fasc for the bytecode compiler. Is there somehow > a clash on windows because these share the same first three > characters?
It' my mistake. I just misinterpreted other failure, and when noticed the implementation-identifier is the same decided (mistakenly) it is the cause. Sorry for disturbing you. >> (in my case >> C:\Users\anton\AppData\Roaming\common-lisp\cache\ecl-11.1.1-win-x86\). > > I'm a bit surprised that LOCALAPPDATA includes Roaming\ instead of > Local\ but then again I don't understand Windows paths very well. If > you think that's wrong, please suggest a better heuristic for choosing > a path to the cache. For me Roaming is OK. Best regards, - Anton _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
