"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <[email protected]> writes: >> Sorry, why should that definition fix the problem? I.e., what is it >> about compiling the file from source that ensures that swank will be >> loaded, when loading the FASL doesn't? > > The #+swank in the source file.
I mean, I expect the #+swank in the source file to disable the dependency on swank when it is not present. Notice that using #+swank (:file "swank-stuff") in the ASD file, works to disable loading swank-stuff, but since now I have to put #+swank (call-swank-stuff) in the other files, I still have the same problem: I need to erase the fasl in .cache/common-lisp and recompile everything when I need to switch between swank and non-swank targets. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
