> I have just installed Clozure 1.8, and the ASDF version that comes bundled > with it (2.20) breaks my setup for ASDF systems using logical pathnames. That > happens all the time (with recent new versions of LispWorks or SBCL, for > example), and it is very annoying to keep track of which version of ASDF > works and which doesn't. > What bugs are you experiencing? Can you show us your setup? It would help if we had test cases against which to test our support for logical-pathnames. Last major change was in 2.016.2.
> I am now considering changing my setup away from logical pathnames, in the > hope that I don't have to worry that much about ASDF anymore. However, this > means that I can't use a portable setup anymore, so I am trying to figure out > to what extent this is still important. That's what the paragraph above is > about. (Sorry for cross-posting, but I think it's important to see this in > context.) > Unhappily, portable pathnames are anything but. You can do things more portably without logical pathnames, e.g. with asdf:system-relative-pathname. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
