On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Robert Goldman wrote:
On 4/20/12 Apr 20 -6:43 PM, Daniel Herring wrote:

ASDF does not need to support arbitrary encodings in system definition
files.  UTF-8 is the simplest and most portable solution for non-ASCII
characters in system definitions.

This seems mostly true.  The only exception I can really think of is for
metadata.  What if the author's name uses non UTF-8?

What character in the author's name cannot be encoded in UTF-8?

Yes, there are some hieroglyphs and other ancient character sets not in UTF-8. Are there any gaps in coverage for current languages that have other character sets?

This will be an inconvenience for those who usually use a different local-specific encoding, and I think it is less than the inconvenience to the whole community if we try to support other encodings in the definition files.

- Daniel

_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel

Reply via email to