On 4/21/12 1:13 PM, Faré wrote: >> Yeah, I was on the wrong branch. With the master branch, make lisp >> fails because when cmucl compiles asdf, there are a few notes which I >> guess are warnings. If you modify compile-asdf.lisp to ignore the >> warnings (like it already does for ecl and scl), then the tests can >> proceed. At the end I get: >> > Interesting. > In 2.20.15 (last Monday), I had to ignore similar warnings on SCL. > There used to not be warnings. > No "WARNING" message shows, only compiler notes. > Are they the warnings? Isn't it a bug that > they should count as warnings rather than say mere style-warnings?
Hard to say. The notes are about code not reached. Depending on what is not reachable, they could be serious errors or just innocuous notes. > In any case, I've just disabled bork-on-warning on CMUCL as well as SCL. > >> -#--------------------------------------- >> Using cmulisp -noinit -batch >> Ran 39 tests: >> 39 passing and 0 failing >> all tests apparently successful >> -#--------------------------------------- >> >> This is with CMU Common Lisp snapshot-2012-04 (20C Unicode) running on >> OSX 10.6.8. This is, of course, the "official" build from common-lisp.net. >> > I don't see that snapshot on the download page; > but browsing the site by editing existing linked URLs, I find > http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2012/04/ > > And yes, it works for me, too, with the 2012-04 snapshot. Yay! > But as reported a few days ago, it was borking for me on vanilla 20c. > > Can you link the working snapshot from the download page? > That beats offering a failing release as first choice. As I mentioned already to Robert, I have failed to update the pages on www.cmucl.org and www.cons.org/cmucl. The trac.common-lisp.net/cmucl page is more up-to-date. Ray _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
